SITM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Advanced Micro Devices has a net margin of -27.62% compared to SiTime's net margin of 6.29%. SiTime's return on equity of -13.4% beat Advanced Micro Devices's return on equity of 2.9%.

SiTime has a consensus price target of $240.17, signalling upside risk potential of 84.68%. On the other hand Advanced Micro Devices has an analysts' consensus of $144.57 which suggests that it could grow by 62.99%. Given that SiTime has higher upside potential than Advanced Micro Devices, analysts believe SiTime is more attractive than Advanced Micro Devices.

SiTime has a beta of 1.982, which suggesting that the stock is 98.226% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Advanced Micro Devices has a beta of 1.887, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.664%.

SiTime has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Advanced Micro Devices offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SiTime pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Advanced Micro Devices pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SiTime quarterly revenues are $68.1M, which are smaller than Advanced Micro Devices quarterly revenues of $7.7B. SiTime's net income of -$18.8M is lower than Advanced Micro Devices's net income of $482M. Notably, SiTime's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Advanced Micro Devices's PE ratio is 89.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SiTime is 14.83x versus 5.63x for Advanced Micro Devices. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FormFactor has a net margin of -27.62% compared to SiTime's net margin of 5.12%. SiTime's return on equity of -13.4% beat FormFactor's return on equity of 7.43%.

SiTime has a consensus price target of $240.17, signalling upside risk potential of 84.68%. On the other hand FormFactor has an analysts' consensus of $42.22 which suggests that it could grow by 60.97%. Given that SiTime has higher upside potential than FormFactor, analysts believe SiTime is more attractive than FormFactor.

SiTime has a beta of 1.982, which suggesting that the stock is 98.226% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FormFactor has a beta of 1.153, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.266%.

SiTime has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. FormFactor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SiTime pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FormFactor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SiTime quarterly revenues are $68.1M, which are smaller than FormFactor quarterly revenues of $189.5M. SiTime's net income of -$18.8M is lower than FormFactor's net income of $9.7M. Notably, SiTime's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while FormFactor's PE ratio is 29.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SiTime is 14.83x versus 2.70x for FormFactor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intel has a net margin of -27.62% compared to SiTime's net margin of -0.88%. SiTime's return on equity of -13.4% beat Intel's return on equity of -17.02%.

SiTime has a consensus price target of $240.17, signalling upside risk potential of 84.68%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $22.90 which suggests that it could grow by 15.17%. Given that SiTime has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe SiTime is more attractive than Intel.

SiTime has a beta of 1.982, which suggesting that the stock is 98.226% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.129, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.94%.

SiTime has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intel offers a yield of 2.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. SiTime pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend.

SiTime quarterly revenues are $68.1M, which are smaller than Intel quarterly revenues of $14.3B. SiTime's net income of -$18.8M is higher than Intel's net income of -$126M. Notably, SiTime's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intel's PE ratio is 95.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SiTime is 14.83x versus 1.60x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of -27.62% compared to SiTime's net margin of 56.17%. SiTime's return on equity of -13.4% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32%.

SiTime has a consensus price target of $240.17, signalling upside risk potential of 84.68%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $168.01 which suggests that it could grow by 56.19%. Given that SiTime has higher upside potential than NVIDIA, analysts believe SiTime is more attractive than NVIDIA.

SiTime has a beta of 1.982, which suggesting that the stock is 98.226% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.959, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.871%.

SiTime has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. SiTime pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SiTime quarterly revenues are $68.1M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $39.3B. SiTime's net income of -$18.8M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B. Notably, SiTime's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 36.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SiTime is 14.83x versus 20.45x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.